The Effectiveness of Leadership at the Imam Bonjol Padang College of Social and Political Sciences in Decision Making
Efektifitas Kepemimpinan di Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Sosial dan Politik (STISIPOL) Imam Bonjol Padang dalam Pembuatan Keputusan
Abstract
This research is based on the phenomenon that the leader of STISIPOL Imam Bonjol Padang as a leader of the university is suspected of having weaknesses in the management of his institution both administratively and academically. This condition is a problem that must be overcome in anticipation of a better situation considering that educational institutions are producers of human resources. The research method is descriptive qualitative. Data were collected using triangulation techniques through field observations, interviews and documentation studies, sampling techniques with purposive snowball sampling. The results show that the weakness of the leadership can be seen from the level of education and the lack of initiatives needed for the development of high schools, it is necessary to increase communication skills, literacy, and organizational understanding to increase the effectiveness of leadership functions for institutions and a good academic culture for all academicians
References
S. Ahmad, “Instruksional Kepala Sekolah,” Probl. Kurikulum 2013 Dan Kepemimp. Instr. Kepala Sekol., vol. 8, no. 1693–1775, pp. 98–108, 2014, [Online]. Available: http://www.jurnal.unsyiah.ac.id/JPP/article/download/2158/2111.
E. M. Budiarti, “Pengaruh Kualitas Layanan, Budaya Akademik, Dan Citra Lembaga Terhadap Kepuasan Mahasiswa,” J. Manaj. dan Supervisi Pendidik., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 169–178, 2018, doi: 10.17977/um025v2i32018p169.
Musradinur, “Pembentukan Moral Mahasiswa Dalam Mewujudkan Budaya Akademik Berbasis Nilai Islami,” BIdayah. J. Ilmu Keislam., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 27–36, 2019.
R. Susanti, “Penerapan Pendidikan Karakter Di Kalangan Mahasiswa,” Al-Ta lim J., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 480–487, 2013, doi: 10.15548/jt.v20i3.46.
S. Sunarni, D. E. Kusumaningrum, and D. D. N. Benty, “Pemetaan Gaya Dan Tipe Kepemimpinan Kepala Sekolah,” Sekol. Dasar Kaji. Teor. dan Prakt. Pendidik., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 19–29, 2018, doi: 10.17977/um009v27i12018p019.
Ambiyar dan Muharika, “Metodologi Penelitian Evaluasi Program,” Int. J. Physiol., 2018.
A. Arifin, “Strategi Manajemen perubahan dalam meningkatkan disiplin diperguruan tinggi,” EDUTECH ilmu Pendidik. dan ilmu Sos., vol. 3 No 1, no. 1, pp. 117–132, 2017.
A. Thoyib, “Hubungan Kepemimpinan, Budaya, Strategi, Dan Kinerja: Pendekatan Konsep,” J. Manaj. dan Wirausaha, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 60–73, 2005, doi: 10.9744/jmk.7.1.pp.60-73.
M. Arif, “Hubungan Budaya Akademik dan Budaya Organisasi dengan Kinerja Guru,” Tadbir J. Stud. Manaj. Pendidik., vol. 3, no. 1, p. 17, 2019, doi: 10.29240/jsmp.v3i1.804.
H. Ibda and E. Rahmadi, “Penguatan Literasi Baru pada Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah dalam Menjawab Tantangan Era Revolusi Industri 4.0,” JRTIE J. Res. Thought Islam. Educ., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–21, 2018.
M. Dewi, Y. Retno Sari, S. Amna, Rasmita, and R. Susanti, “The understanding of lecturers about the new literacy in industrial revolution era 4.0: A study case of university of putra indonesia yptk padang,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1339, no. 1, pp. 0–7, 2019, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1339/1/012105.
M. Dewi, E. Susanti, R. Susanti, Z. Yenni, and E. Eliza, “the Effect of Mindset Personal on Behavior of Internet Entrepreneurship Students of Universitas Putra Indonesia Yptk Padang,” Sosiohumaniora, vol. 22, no. 1, p. 1, 2020, doi: 10.24198/sosiohumaniora.v22i1.25625.
